A lineup of the available 2018 kosher Pinot Noirs from around the world

|

Created by:

In the past few months, there have been many releases of Pinot Noir from the 2018 vintage. For the most part, there are no real winners here, QPR and otherwise, except for two – the Herzog Pinot Noir, Reserve, and the Herzog Eagle’s Landing Pinot Noir (though the Eagle’s Landing is the only QPR WINNER).

The tasting included all the wines I could find though I left out two, the 2018 Barkan Pinot Noir and the 2018 Tura Pinot Noir. Both of them are Mevushal, and they do a HORRIBLE job on Mevushal, so I did not want to waste my money. My love for all things Pinot is well known, and I had such high hopes. I also seemed to have missed tasting the 2018 Vitkin Pinot Noir, as well.

It is funny how the media can change people’s perspectives, and in some cases twist them in a way that we would not expect.  Say Pinot Noir and most wine drinkers will think of the enigmatic anti-hero Miles Raymond, and his explanation on his love for Pinot Noir; “…It’s, uh, it’s thin-skinned, temperamental, ripens early. It’s, you know, it’s not a survivor like Cabernet, which can just grow anywhere and thrive even when it’s neglected. No, Pinot needs constant care and attention. You know?…“.  Pinot is a complicated grape – but not to its detriment.  Listen to Miles throughout Sideways and you may come to think that Pinot is fleeting, flinty, thin, and complicated. In the end, as you watch that horrible movie, you quickly realize that Miles was simply projecting in a fire fueled rambling and using Pinot Noir as his conduit.

To the French, Pinot Noir is called Burgundy – following the tradition of French wineries to name their wines after the region where the grapes are grown. Americans have had success with Pinot – in California, Oregon, and Washington State. New Zealand, has taken the lead in bringing the grape into the 21st century. The French Burgundy has its terroir (earthy dirt flavors, sometimes barnyard flavors as well). The New Zealand and American Pinots show characteristics that are more akin to Syrah than Burgundy – fruit-forward, meaty wines with soft caressing tannins. The rest of the world is choosing sides. Though true terroir flavors are hard to replicate outside of Burgundy, many countries have been successful at bringing out the true fruit characteristics that the land is willing to share and are creating wonderful Pinot Noirs. Israel was starting to come into its own with Pinot Noir, now all I would buy from Israel, in regards to Pinot would be from Gvaot. Yes, Vitkin does a nice enough job, but Gvaot does a better one. Right now, the best bet is France and the USA, with a drop from Israel, and after that, we are on empty. Sadly, 2018 was not a great year for Four Gates and what I had was not great, it was never officially bottled, but we have 2019 coming soon!

Sadly, Pinot Noir to me is one of those wines that is so badly mangled in the kosher wine world, that it is no shock that most kosher oenophiles, turn face when u say Pinot Noir. Not on account of the Pinot Noir grapes themselves, but rather on account of the pathetic state of kosher Pinot Noir wine on the market.

Say, Pinot Noir to me, and sadly I can only think of:

Pinot Noir is one of my favorite wines, NO NOT because of sideways! I loved the wine long before that horrific cult movie hit the theaters. I love PN for what it stands for – complexity through things other than fruit! A well made Pinot Noir, in my humble opinion, needs to be of medium body, medium fruit structure, accompanied by mounds of dirt, mushroom, barnyard, and earthy goodness. The ultimate aspect of a great PN is the secondary flavors, not the fruit, not cherry cola, and for the LOVE OF GOD not OAK! It is all about the secondary and old age notes that come with time and love.

Sadly, look at that list. Four Gates is tough to get in quantity. The Gvaot Pinot is available, but they are more Cab and rich than a pure ethereal wine, though very impressive. The Eagle’s Landing 2013 vintage is still available at the winery, and the 2016/2018 vintages rocked! The real winners are the French options, but they are NOT cheap.

So, where are we? Some like the Galil Pinot and other such structured wines, but to me, they are just bad Cabernet in a Pinot’s clothing. This is a shortlist. Heck, there are HUNDREDS of Cabernet, Merlot, Syrah, even many Cabernet Franc options. But say Pinot and numbers dwindle in the blink of an eye. Further, many of the options here are vintage based. For the true Pinot lover, Four Gates and France are your sure bets. Sadly, only the last one is pumping out wines consistently.

PSA: What is wrong with you all?? The Eagle’s Landing Pinot Noir has consistently been a high-rated wine and one that lasts for a very long time, improving along the way with great panache. Yet, you can still buy the 2013 and 2016 vintages of this wonderful wine!! I bought a bunch of 2013 from Herzog. I get NOTHING to tell you this other than pleasure. BUY the wine and enjoy one bottle now and save the others for a rainy day in 2026. Buy this now!!

Sadly, there were no surprises here, the 2018 Gvaot was nice, the Eagle’s Landing was great, and the Herzog Reserve Pinot (a return after many years of non-production) was also very nice. That is about it. The 2018 Jean Luc & Paul Aegerter Burgundies were tasted previously (the notes added here for completeness).

The wine notes follow below – the explanation of my “scores” can be found here:

2018 Herzog Eagle’s Landing Pinot Noir, Santa Rita Hills – Score: 93 (QPR: WINNER)Let me start by saying buy this wine, buy lots of this wine, I mean a LOT! OK, now this wine is a bigger and richer version of the 2013 Eagle’s Landing Pinot Noir, in other words, this wine is a beast, a winner, and yes – get this wine! My only comment is that this wine is not a classically styled Pinot Noir. This wine is full-bodied and not so much about cherry and raspberry and more about blackberry and spice, I would not have initially guessed this was a Pinot Noir, still this a wonderful wine. My only real complaint is the strangely small cork used as its closure, when the Cabernet Franc has a much longer cork, just not sure why. Anyway, I do not care about corks, as long as they last long enough to meet the drinking window.The nose on this wine is pure heaven, coffee and chocolate, and fruit madness, with dirt, mushroom, loam, and spice, all wrapped in dark and brooding fruit, showing control, spice, earth, and sheer umami notes, wow!! The mouth on this full-bodied wine is wow! the mouth starts very softly, almost like a leopard crouching before it pounces upon its prey, this wine is beautifully structured to last, and so well made it is almost difficult to get all the thoughts out of my head, layers of fruit, acid, tannin, salinity (that is incredible), black olives, with epic fruit structure and concentration, with clear and bold and jammy blackberry, raspberry, dark cherry, with intense saline, forest floor, searing acidity, and layers of dark jammy brooding but well-controlled fruit. With time the cherry and raspberry fall behind the intense black and intense brooding fruit. The finish is equally impressive with layers of chocolate, coffee, leather, spices, nutmeg, cloves, rich earth, lovely smoking tobacco leaves, sweet and jammy fruit, all wrapped in mineral, spice, and earth. Bravo!!! Drink from 2024 until 2033 or longer.

This content is for members only. Please Login  or Subscribe Here to continue reading!

Like This:

, , , , ,
  1. Yerachmiel Avatar

    Any thoughts about the Landsman from Covenant?

    1. Adam Sragovicz Avatar

      YMMV but I did find the 2019 Landsman Pinot to be exceptional.

      1. winemusings Avatar

        I did not taste it – thx for the info

  2. winemusings Avatar

    Sadly, they have not been what I have liked for some time now, the last one I really liked was 2013.

  3. Ira Kahn Avatar

    What exact price and price category did you use for the 2018 Eagles Landing and 2018 Herzog Reserve?

    1. winemusings Avatar

      Hello,

      The 2018 Herzog Pinot Noir, Reserve, which received a 91 is available for 40 dollars and is a top-tier red wine, so that gets it a QPR as GOOD. The Eagle’s landing is also a Top-Tier red and it is available for 44 or so dollars and it scored a higher number (92 or higher), so it gets a WINNER score.

      1. Ira Kahn Avatar

        This is part of a much larger conversation I would like to have with you about the QPR rating (because I am very intrigued by it, believe it is very important, I’m a fan of yours, and I appreciate and support what you do) but I’m curious about the specifics as it relates to these wines because they are basically an apples to apples comparison.

        I hope I correctly understand your methodology and I make sense, but apologize beforehand if I’m incorrect.

        Based on your response, my understanding is that both these wines are in a wine category where the median score is 92 (only cause you said it outright) and the median price is above $44.

        Now I have no idea how you handle in your QPR system the fact that the original score for the Herzog Reserve (HR) was 91+ (is it 91, 91-92, or that it’s 91 now but has likely potential to be greater than 91 in the future). Regardless, if we just use 91 (since you did in your response), how would a difference in price impact the QPR rating of the HR? My understanding of the methodology is that it won’t.

        You used a price of $40. I live in the NYC/Long Island market and have seen a large range of pricing for this wine. But the best price I’ve seen (which is not a sale price) is $30. If I read your reply correctly, the HR is not a winner only because it scored less than 92 and not because of price.

        So it’s hard to understand why price doesn’t help out HR’s QPR rating even if you used $30 (47% cheaper that Eagles Landing vs 9% with your pricing)? What about if HR was $22, making Eagles Landing double the price. Are those 2 points (93 vs 91) worth paying double. (I do think it’s fair to make an argument based on the fact that they have two different tasting profiles).

        I’ll reiterate my caveat again here, that I have my question because they are as close to an apple to apple comparison that can be made (at least that I can think of off the top of my head) because as I understand the only difference in inputs was either the time spent in barrels or a slightly different barrel profile (charring).

        Please don’t post this to the thread if the above is somehow incorrect or if the answer may just confuse people without a larger discussion.

        Thank you

  4. wine_slrpr Avatar

    The ’18 and ’19 Vitkins and the ’18 Gamla would really round this out.

    1. winemusings Avatar

      I will taste the Vitkin soon, the Gamla has never impressed me at all

  5. winemusings Avatar

    Ira Kahn – this is not complex. As I have stated over and over in the blog – QPR WINNER is a designation given only to wines that are below the median price and at or above the median score. So, 91+ (AKA 91.5) is not at the 92 median scores. The price, as I HAVE literally SCREAMED is not the definition of QPR categorization. Price only comes into the equation AFTER the wine’s score. So, if the wine score a 91 and the median is 92, it can never be a WINNER no matter how cheap it is. Be well!

  6. Y B Avatar

    The Vitkin, Tzuba, Tishbi, Tura, Gamla(Israel), Galil Mountain, are usually a step above the pitiful Barkan (who don’t even sell their cheap Pinot in Israel anymore), and are average, which for a Pinot is just about drinkable.

    I believe you must pay better attention to the Yarden offerings, consistently good, sometimes great (2004).
    Ella Valley had a great 2005 vintage, I’ve not seen them since.
    Gush Ezion Winery has produced a Pinot (for awhile available only via the winery) which was not great but potential for the future.
    As to Gvaot I have had 1 vintage and was not blown away, will try the 2018.
    I disagree with your 2018 Segal rating as I see decent complexity and hope for the future.
    MIdbar has produced a 2019 (first that I noticed) that I must try.

    I think that wineries that just want to add another varietal for an additional label fail miserably.
    However those in Israel, or perhaps anywhere, those who choose location with appropriate trepidation and while they are not specialists, at least harbor some respect for the grape, you can taste the distinction and care …AND then must wait for a great vintage.
    I would include Yarden, Gvaot, Segal, Gush Ezion in that category currently.
    Thanks for all your insights!

    1. winemusings Avatar

      Hello Y.B.

      I commented about a 2010 vintage because that was the last good cheap Burg, but the post was about 2018 Pinot Noir wines. I have never had a good Yarden ANYTHING (other than sparkling and sweet), after 2009. Gush made a fun Pinot noir, look at my previous posts – but since 2013 they have been painful or non-existent. 2019 was not the vintage of this post.
      The Segal is date juice, but again, my perception is different from others, no problem – enjoy it if you can.

      Overall, Pinot is not the grape for Israel – which was really the point of the post and that Gvaot is the rare exception. I REMEMBER WELL with great sadness of the GOOD OLD DAYS of Ella Valley Pinots – again this post was about 2018!! Be well.

Leave a Reply to winemusingsCancel reply

Discover more from Kosher Wine Database

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading